Capitolo 13
one? Because it is a crews virtuous in all life of his and another bestial?
Because one is born intelligent and another idiot? If God out of Your really
wish manufactured these inequalities all, or, in the other words, if God created
a man to suffer and another to enjoy, then as partial and unfair
owe Him is! He has to be worse of a tyrant. As we adore him to us,
how do you call him/it only and merciful?
Some people try to save God from this position of the partiality and
the injustice saying that all the good things of this universe are the job
of God, and all the bad things are the job of a demon or Satan. God
created everything good, but it was Satan that brought bad in this
world and it did all bad. I/you/he/she now allow us to see how far such affirmation
it is right. Good and I win it is two relative terms; the
existence of one depends on that some other. Good person cannot exist
without bad, and I win you/he/she cannot exist without being reported to
good. When God created what we call good person, He has had to create bad to
the same time, otherwise He could not create good alone. If the
creative of bad, you call him/it from whatever name that he likes, you/he/she had brought bad
in this world, he has had to simultaneously create him with God;
otherwise you/he/she would have been impossible for God to create good, what
you/he/she can only exist as reported to bad. How their man they will have to admit
what the Creators of good person and I win he/she sat together with the same one lasted to
you create this world that is a mixture of good person and I wins. Accordingly,
both of them they are equally powerful, and limited by each other.
Therefore none of them is endless in the powers or almighty. Then us
you/he/she cannot say that the Almighty that God of the universe has created good alone
and not the bad.
Another matter that the Vedantistses advance in support of the theory
of Reincarnation is that "Nothing is destroyed in the universe."
The destruction in the sense of the annihilation of a thing is unknown to
the philosophers of Vedantic, in the moment in which he is unknown to the modern one