Capitolo 89
to him that he didn't possess right to the kingdom of England
what he could pass above hereditarily to his/her heirs. These words were able
without the violence is done for producing this meaning, and still it is impossible
to interpret them so in on some principle of sound of the criticism,
certainly not as the foundation of some constitutional doctrine. There is
not a particle of support for this interpretation from some other source;
all the shows that his/her child William succeeded him/it in England from
the same right and in the same way according to which Robert did in Normandy. William
he/she speaks of him to the first rentals, as holding England from hereditary
right. He is probable ready to admit that you/he/she had not come to him from
so as amended, but never that having earned once him he contained him/it for him
and his/her family from some as amended of this. The words assigned to William
on his/her death-bed certainly you/he/she should be interpreted by the words of the same
reporter, after he has ended the confession; and these point out of it
you doubt on the part of William as to the effect of his/her death on the stability of
his/her conquest in England and his/her great desire to accelerate his/her child William
away in England with directions to Lanfranc as to his/her crowning before
the news of his own death you/they should be shed to the foreign countries. Yours implicate that he is
not sure who can become an indeed king in the tumults that can rise when
he/she is known that its his/her own strong rule is ended; that remains with God:
but they without doubt expresses some right of his/her heirs, neither of his own right
to determine what among he/she will succeed him/it to them.
With reluctance, knowing his/her disposition, William granted Normandy to
Robert. The first-born child was coming to have special rights. More
important in this case the fact was that Robert's right to Normandy had
is formally recognized first years, and that recognition never had