Capitolo 66
not to the moment you mix Seward to any replica. But five days later, on
March 25, Lyons gave a supper to Seward and a number of the foreigner
Ministers, and there the violent discourse of Seward around grabbing some and everybody
ships that have tried to deal with the South, even if there was no block,
Lyons done very anxious. As an innkeeper he diverted the conversation so that not it
becomes too much acrimonious, but him he told Seward
"... what really it was so a matter very serious that I was
not prepared to discuss him/it; what its plan seemed to me for amount
in fact to a block of paper of the enormous extension of coast
comprised in States that a secession does; what the to shout it a
strengthening of the Income Laws it seemed to me to increase
the gravity of the measure, for him the Foreign Powers put in
the dilemma to recognize the Southern Confederation or of
submitting to the interruption of their commerce[99]."
The suggestion of Lyons to Russell was that any dry refusal should be given the Southerner
Commissioners when they arrived to London, but that they is essays
well. This, he thought, it would open the eyes of Seward to his/her folly. Still
Lyons didn't fully believe still that Seward would have been so vigorous as his
language seemed to implicate, and March 29 he wrote that "prudent
suggestions" they were in the ascendancy that would not be interference
with "_at commercial present_", and that a tone of quieter was everywhere
perceptible in Washington[100].
From the point of view of the British Minister to Washington, the
stain of danger in relationships between the United States and disposition of Great Britain
in this matter of interference with work to Southern harbors. Naturally,
and as in limited duty, he tried to preserve that work. For before,
indeed, he seems to have thought that even if a civil war really
achieved the commercial one it would continue nonstop. He was certainly born very hard
and continually on this one point, looking for of not only to influence