Capitolo 68
respects for the honor of his/her profession, by chance also, a certain
hearing some personal dignity that
[Footnote 156: (the cont.) you call to picked up a Brigade of Indians in Kansas in the
service of the United States, to assist the friendly Stream Indian in
maintaining their loyalty. It had this permission is quickly granted,
I am every right to believe that the disastrous and present state of
business, in the west of Indian country of Arkansas you/they would be been able to be
avoided. I respectfully repeat again now my application."--Indian Office
General Archivi, _Southern Superintendency_ 1859-1862.]
[Footnote 157: To the references given in Abel, American _The Indian
how Slaveholder and Secessionist_, add Thomas to Hunter, January 24,
1862, _Official Records_, vol. viii, 525.]
[Footnote 158: St. Luigi _Republican_ accredited Halleck with
characterizing the command of Hunter, indiscriminately as "predatory,
bandits, and he/she banishes" [_Daily Conservative_, February 7 th 1862].
In a letter to Lincoln, January 6 th 1862, it said Halleck some beautiful
the simple truths on Lane [_Official Records_, vol. vii, 532-533].
He would probably have had the same objection to the use of
Indian that he had to the use of negroes in war [_Daily
Conservative_, May 23, 1862, quoting from the Chicago
_Tribune_].]
[Footnote 159: On to plunder from the brigade of Lane, sees McClellan to
Stanton, February 11 th 1862 [_Official Records_, vol. viii,
552-553].]
executive interference and legitimately resentful with his/her right. His
protest had its effect and him he informed that it was completely among
his/her prerogative to conduct the consignment him toward south. He resolved
to do him/it. Lane was, for once, outwitted.
The end was not however still. Around the middle one of January, Stanton
become Secretary of War and soon he/she left him/it both wiseacre and he, had also
seen on the subject of Indian enlistment. As a matter of fact, him
refused to approve him/it. [160] The disappointment was the most acute